|
|

|
|
|
Risks of using common reference intervals for Mexican American, nonHispanic
Black and nonHispanic White populations.
George S. Cembrowski, MD, PhD and Julie Chan, BSc (MLS), MLT
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta
Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta
Many laboratorians realize that the normal range (health-associated
reference interval) of certain clinical chemistry tests varies significantly by
race. In addition to pathologic change, these differences can arise from
socioeconomic and / or genetic variation. Because clinical laboratories usually
do not collect race information, the reference intervals used by most US
laboratories cannot accurately represent all of its patient customers. We have
compared reference intervals for US Mexican Americans (MA), nonHispanic Blacks
(NHB) and nonHispanic Whites (NHW) which were derived from the 3rd U.S.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (graphical reference interval
summaries stratified by age, sex and race are available at
www.mylaboratoryquality.com).
When evaluating male and female 2.5 percentile (P) and 97.5P reference
intervals, the following analytes demonstrated multiple statistically
significant differences (p<0.01) between MA and NHB or MA and NHW or NHB and
NHW: creatinine, triglycerides, total protein, iron, albumin, phosphate, urea
nitrogen, ALT and AST. To illustrate, the male NHB 97.5P for total protein
averages 3.9 percent higher than that of the male NHW (p<0.01). Albumins are
5.0 percent higher in female NHB than in female NHW (p<0.01). Because the US
upper reference limit for total protein usually represents that of the NHW,
many NHB are probably unnecessarily worked up for hyperproteinemia. Another
example is ALT, with the female NHB ALT 97.5P limit being 53 percent and 46
percent less than that of the MA and NHW respectively. Male NHB have ALT, which
are 27 percent and 10 percent less than MA and NHW. US ALT reference intervals
have been gradually broadening due to increasing rates of obesity and resulting
metabolic syndrome. This broadening may be due to the incorporation of
overweight MA and NHW into reference interval estimations. This broadened
common reference interval decreases the sensitivity to detect occult liver
disease in NHB. It is incumbent on the clinical laboratory to provide more
meaningful reference intervals for its patients. Otherwise, many of the
improvement processes external to the interpretation phase are rendered
ineffective.
|