| | | | | | Sixgun City Antigen/Virus |
|---|
| | CF | SMNT |
|---|
| Immune Sera | Ht/Ho | Ratio | Ht/Ho |
|---|
|
| | Mono Lake (Ar 861) | 32/64 | 1/2 | 3.5/6.0(a) | | Huacho (Ar 883) | 16/32 | 1/2 | 1.9/4.5 | | Chenuda (Ar 1170) | 0/128 | 0/128 | - |
| | | | | Sixgun City Immune Serum |
|---|
| | CF | SMNT |
|---|
| Antigens/Viruses | Ht/Ho | Ratio | Ht/Ho |
|---|
|
| | a LNI in dex | | Mono Lake (Ar 861) | 64/64 | 1 | 6.0/3.7 a | | Huacho (Ar 883) | 16/32 | 1/2 | 2.9/3.7 | | Chenuda (Ar 1170) | 0/128 | 0/128 | - |
| | In a tissue-culture neutralization test, Sixgun City virus plaques were unaffected by immune sera from 13 viruses: Chenuda (Ar 1170), Nyamanini (Ar 1304), Sapphire I, Sapphire II, Johnston Atoll, Powassan (791A), Quaranfil (Ar 1113), Raza, Matucare, Midway (RML 47153), Wad Medani (Ar 492) and Punta Salinas (Ar 888). However, Sixgun City virus plaques were significantly neutralized (>3.0 dex) upon exposure to Mono Lake (Ar 861) and Huacho (Ar 883) immune sera [1] . In CF tests we were unable to show a relationship between Sixgun City and Chenuda viruses, although this was readily demonstrated for Mono Lake and Chenuda viruses [1] . Further work may reveal Mono Lake, Huacho and Sixgun City viruses to be geographic or populational variants of a single virus. | | |
|
